• About
    • Our Team
    • Our Name
    • Our Vision
    • Our Approach
    • Books & Publications
  • Services
    • Executive & Employee Compensation
    • Executive Compensation Analysis & Design
    • Annual Incentive Analysis & Design
    • Long-Term Incentive Analysis & Design
    • Pay for Performance Analysis & Design
    • Compensation Philosophy Development
    • Deferred Compensation Analysis & Design
    • Executive & Employee Compensation
    • Executive Compensation Analysis & Design
    • Annual Incentive Analysis & Design
    • Long-Term Incentive Analysis & Design
    • Pay for Performance Analysis & Design
    • Compensation Philosophy Development
    • Deferred Compensation Analysis & Design
    • Compensation in Special Circumstances
    • Compensation Expert Witness Testimony
    • Compensation in a Change of Control
    • Compensation in an IPO
    • Compensation in Restructuring & Bankruptcy
    • Mergers & Acquisition Compensation
    • Nonprofit Compensation
    • Pay Equity Analysis
    • Compensation in a Private, Family-Owned Business
    • Employment Agreements
    • Compensation in Special Circumstances
    • Compensation Expert Witness Testimony
    • Compensation in a Change of Control
    • Compensation in an IPO
    • Compensation in Restructuring & Bankruptcy
    • Mergers & Acquisition Compensation
    • Nonprofit Compensation
    • Pay Equity Analysis
    • Compensation in a Private, Family-Owned Business
    • Employment Agreements
    • Governance Services
    • Board of Directors Compensation
    • Compensation Discussion & Analysis (CD&A)
    • Compensation Risk Assessment
    • Shareholder Engagement Services
    • Proxy Advisor Services
    • ESG Services
    • Governance Services
    • Board of Directors Compensation
    • Compensation Discussion & Analysis (CD&A)
    • Compensation Risk Assessment
    • Shareholder Engagement Services
    • Proxy Advisor Services
    • ESG Services
  • Industries
  • Perspectives
  • Join Our Team
  • Get in Touch
832.363.5089
Pay vs performance 2023

SEC’s Pay Versus Performance – 2023 Early Impressions

As we head into March and the start of proxy season, the SEC’s newly required Pay Versus Performance disclosures are front of mind for many that deal with compensation and corporate governance. The Commission just recently released some *timely* clarifications on their rules, called Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations (SEC’s C&DI’s), which introduced clarifications (or complexities) for many public issuers just days before some proxy statements went live. Given SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s comments that the new rules “will help investors receive the consistent, comparable, and decision-useful information they need to evaluate executive compensation policies,” we thought an analysis of early disclosure examples might help inform investor utility?

Early Impressions

At the time of this writing, there were 18 companies that had filed 10-Ks or proxy statements which included Pay Versus Performance disclosures. While there will be differing approaches to how companies furnish their required disclosures, there are some early trends forming that seem worth noting. 

1. Compensation Actually Paid “CAP” Varies Widely
As predicted, there is a wide variance between the calculation of CAP vs. summary compensation table. The first 18 disclosures report a variance of -471% to +191%. While there is a correlation of CAP to company TSR that helps illustrate company pay and performance vs peers, the methodology for CAP calculation and resulting wide variance seems to weaken investor clarity.

 

Company NameTicker Filing DateIndustryRatio of Total CAP to Total SCT for PEOTotal PEO SCTTotal PEO CAPTSR 2022TSR 2021TSR 2020
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.PRAX2/7/2023Biotechnology-471%$16,933,898.00 ($79,796,078.00)-96%-64%n/a
TRACON Pharmaceuticals, Inc.TCON2/13/2023Biotechnology30%$3,323,963.00 $1,005,111.00 -87%-76%n/a
Owens CorningOC2/24/2023Building Products139%$28,311,786.00 $39,397,373.00 37%43%18%
MYR Group Inc.MYRG2/23/2023Construction and Engineering191%$11,668,361.00 $22,294,377.00 183%239%84%
IQVIA Holdings Inc.IQV2/27/2023Life Sciences Tools and Services165%$84,326,866.00 $139,013,042.00 33%83%16%
AGNC Investment Corp.AGNC2/23/2023Mortgage REITs95%$41,678,000.00 $39,583,535.00 -19%4%-2%
CSI Compressco LPCCLP2/7/2023Oil and Gas Equipment and Services91%$2,974,859.00 $2,699,329.00 32%15%n/a
Schlumberger LimitedSLB2/23/2023Oil and Gas Equipment and Services161%$38,159,343.00 $61,260,541.00 42%-22%-44%
Equitrans Midstream CorporationETRN2/23/2023Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation50%$23,342,207.00 $11,674,688.00 -36%-8%-33%
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.MMP2/21/2023Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation103%$30,643,493.00 $31,506,987.00 4%-11%-26%
Commerce Bancshares, Inc.CBSH2/21/2023Regional Banks107%$13,821,593.00 $14,729,699.00 22%15%3%
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.FMAO2/16/2023Regional Banks103%$1,471,410.00 $1,520,773.00 25%46%n/a
Park National CorporationPRK2/17/2023Regional Banks107%$6,617,603.00 $7,050,872.00 55%46%8%
ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.SFBS2/23/2023Regional Banks116%$6,719,682.00 $7,765,335.00 86%124%9%
Trustmark CorporationTRMK2/17/2023Regional Banks88%$8,828,047.00 $7,794,709.00 11%0%-18%
Federal Realty Investment TrustFRT2/24/2023Retail REITs100%$23,918,744.00 $23,849,719.00 -11%15%-31%
Luther Burbank CorporationLBC2/22/2023Thrifts and Mortgage Finance106%$4,416,526.00 $4,689,547.00 21%47%n/a
Fastenal CompanyFAST2/24/2023Trading Companies and Distributors137%$10,402,374.00 $14,202,541.00 38%83%37%
Average79%
Median105%

2. The Line of Business Index is the most common approach for determining peer group total shareholder return (TSR)
As companies began their PVP preparations in the fall, one of the first disclosure elements discussed was the construct of the peer group that would be used for TSR calculation purposes (for any readers involved with Smaller Reporting Companies, no need to fret as the peer group TSR disclosure is not part of your scaled down requirements). Initially, companies and advisors debated what type of peer group would satisfy the requirements – an index or issuers used for the performance graph in the 10-K? Companies identified as the compensation benchmarking peer group in the CD&A? Something else? Given these unknowns, as well as the complexity of having to calculate peer group TSR on a weighted basis based on each company’s market capitalization, many companies early on gravitated toward the idea of using a line of business index for determining peer group TSR. Despite the SEC’s C&DI’s clearing up the confusion on peer group design, it appears the majority of companies (8 of 13 with Peer Group TSR requirement) decided to stick with their initial preference and used a relevant line of business index as the peer group for the tabular disclosure.

 

Company NameTicker Filing DateIndustryPeer group used
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.PRAX2/7/2023BiotechnologyN/A – SRC
TRACON Pharmaceuticals, Inc.TCON2/13/2023BiotechnologyN/A – SRC
Owens CorningOC2/24/2023Building ProductsNot clear
MYR Group Inc.MYRG2/23/2023Construction and Engineering10-K Performance Graph Peers
IQVIA Holdings Inc.IQV2/27/2023Life Sciences Tools and ServicesCompensation Peer Group
AGNC Investment Corp.AGNC2/23/2023Mortgage REITsLine of Business Index
CSI Compressco LPCCLP2/7/2023Oil and Gas Equipment and ServicesN/A – SRC
Schlumberger LimitedSLB2/23/2023Oil and Gas Equipment and ServicesLine of Business Index
Equitrans Midstream CorporationETRN2/23/2023Oil and Gas Storage and TransportationLine of Business Index
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.MMP2/21/2023Oil and Gas Storage and TransportationLine of Business Index
Commerce Bancshares, Inc.CBSH2/21/2023Regional BanksLine of Business Index
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.FMAO2/16/2023Regional BanksN/A – SRC
Park National CorporationPRK2/17/2023Regional BanksCompensation Peer Group
ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.SFBS2/23/2023Regional BanksLine of Business Index
Trustmark CorporationTRMK2/17/2023Regional BanksLine of Business Index
Federal Realty Investment TrustFRT2/24/2023Retail REITsLine of Business Index
Luther Burbank CorporationLBC2/22/2023Thrifts and Mortgage FinanceN/A – SRC
Fastenal CompanyFAST2/24/2023Trading Companies and DistributorsGeneral Index

3. Companies are identifying STI metrics to use as the Company-Selected Measure (CSM)
Companies have to identify the CSM and include its performance in the table. The SEC defined the CSM as a measure that represents the “most important” performance measure not already included in the table that is used by the board to link Compensation Actually Paid during the fiscal year to company performance. According to the SEC, staff included the CSM requirement to lessen the likelihood that the required figures in the tables would “misrepresent or provide an incomplete picture of how pay relates to performance.” Many industry participants suggested early on that companies’ CSMs would likely be tied to profitability, as those metrics were often heavily-weighted short-term incentive plan measures. Those projections appear to be accurate, as our early review of disclosures found that most companies (10 out of 13 with CSM) opted for an STI metric as their CSM.

 

Company NameTicker Filing DateIndustryCompany-Selected MeasureNotes
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.PRAX2/7/2023BiotechnologyN/A – SRC
TRACON Pharmaceuticals, Inc.TCON2/13/2023BiotechnologyN/A – SRC
Owens CorningOC2/24/2023Building ProductsAdjusted EBITSTI metric
MYR Group Inc.MYRG2/23/2023Construction and EngineeringPretax IncomeSTI metric
IQVIA Holdings Inc.IQV2/27/2023Life Sciences Tools and ServicesAdjusted Diluted EPS GrowthSTI metric
AGNC Investment Corp.AGNC2/23/2023Mortgage REITsRelative Annual Economic ReturnSTI metric
CSI Compressco LPCCLP2/7/2023Oil and Gas Equipment and ServicesN/A – SRC
Schlumberger LimitedSLB2/23/2023Oil and Gas Equipment and ServicesAdjusted EBITDASTI metric
Equitrans Midstream CorporationETRN2/23/2023Oil and Gas Storage and TransportationEconomic Adjusted EBITDASTI metric
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.MMP2/21/2023Oil and Gas Storage and TransportationDCF per UnitLTI metric
Commerce Bancshares, Inc.CBSH2/21/2023Regional BanksRevenueSTI metric
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.FMAO2/16/2023Regional BanksN/A – SRC
Park National CorporationPRK2/17/2023Regional BanksROAALTI metric, STI modifier metric
ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.SFBS2/23/2023Regional BanksEPSSTI metric
Trustmark CorporationTRMK2/17/2023Regional BanksROATELTI metric
Federal Realty Investment TrustFRT2/24/2023Retail REITsFFO per Diluted ShareSTI metric
Luther Burbank CorporationLBC2/22/2023Thrifts and Mortgage FinanceN/A – SRC
Fastenal CompanyFAST2/24/2023Trading Companies and DistributorsEBITSTI metric

4. The “tabular list” of other measures are predominantly financial, specific to the business
The rules also require registrants, other than SRCs, to disclose a tabular list of at least three, and up to seven, financial performance measures that they determine are the most important measures for the last fiscal year. Since registrants are permitted, but not required, to include non-financial measures in the tabular list (once they have identified at least three financial performance measures), many companies would include some nonfinancial measures in this list – especially given the growing prominence of ESG within discussions surrounding executive pay. As illustrated in the graphic below, most companies in our early review universe only identified additional financial measures as other important metrics to include in their disclosures. Other notable observations: two companies – MYR Group and Equitrans Midstream – included ESG metrics (see shading in the table), and one – Fastenal Company – provided separate lists of metrics for its CEO, CFO and non-CEO/CFO NEOs.

Are the new PVP disclosures useful?
Sometimes more is not always better, it’s just more. While there are more news headlines that may emerge from the new PVP disclosures, true investor clarity does not appear to be one of them.

Get in Contact With Us

LINKS

  • Industries We Serve
  • Executive Compensation
  • ESG Services
  • Board and Governance
  • Compensation in Special Circumstances
  • Articles and News
  • Highest Paid CEOs in Houston, TX
  • About Us
  • Join Our Team
  • Privacy Policy

RECENT POSTS

incentive plan design

Incentive Plan Decision Making

Incentive Plan Decision Making While Pay versus performance disclosures will headline most executive pay stories,

Read More
Pay vs performance 2023

SEC’s Pay Versus Performance – 2023 Early Impressions

SEC’s Pay Versus Performance – 2023 Early Impressions As we head into March and the

Read More
Facebook Linkedin Instagram